Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Speca v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, 2:18-cv-00835-MMD-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181130d30 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 29, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES (FIRST REQUEST) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, by and through their undersigned counsel of record that, pursuant to LR 26-4, the Scheduling Order (Doc. # 15) be amended as follows: I. Discovery Completed The Joint Administrative Record in this ERISA claim was filed with this Court by Defendant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (AETNA) on November 16, 2018 without the need for discovery briefs. I
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES

(FIRST REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, by and through their undersigned counsel of record that, pursuant to LR 26-4, the Scheduling Order (Doc. # 15) be amended as follows:

I. Discovery Completed

The Joint Administrative Record in this ERISA claim was filed with this Court by Defendant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (AETNA) on November 16, 2018 without the need for discovery briefs.

II. Deadlines Remaining and Reason for Request for Extension

Plaintiff's Rule 52 and/or Rule 56 Motion is currently due by December 7, 2018. The parties are in the process of discussing alternative dispute options and accordingly, would like to postpone the dispositive motion due date to allow them time to pursue those options.

III. Proposed Briefing Schedule

Plaintiff SPECA and Defendant AETNA hereby agree and stipulate to the following proposed deadline extensions:

Description: Current Deadline: Proposed: Plaintiff's Dispositive ERISA Motion 12/07/18 01/07/19 under Rule 52 and/or 56 Aetna's Response to Dispositive 01/04/19 02/04/19 Motion Plaintiff's Reply 01/18/19 02/19/19

We, the undersigned, represent to the Court that this request for extension is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

WHEREFORE, the parties jointly request that this Court adopt the proposed scheduling deadlines as indicated above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer