HALL v. THOMAS, 1:13cv-901-WHA (WO). (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160226938
Visitors: 35
Filed: Feb. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #21), entered on February 2, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred under the limitation period in 28
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #21), entered on February 2, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred under the limitation period in 28 U..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #21), entered on February 2, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby
ORDERED that this habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition is time-barred under the limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Source: Leagle
