Johnson v. Saul, 4:18CV00821 JM-JTR. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190925918
Visitors: 22
Filed: Sep. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. (ECF No. 12). No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT this case is REMANDED pursuant to sente
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. (ECF No. 12). No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT this case is REMANDED pursuant to senten..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. (ECF No. 12). No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
Source: Leagle
