IN RE AREDIA® AND ZOMETA® PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 3:06-MD-1760. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20130809631
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2013
Summary: ORDER JOE B. BROWN, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the court is NPC's motion to vacate and dismiss. (DE 6627; Related Case 47) Although plaintiff discusses Texas law tangentially in his response to NPC's motion with respect to the rights of "heirs" when a decedent dies intestate (DE 6727, pp. 7-8; Related Case 51), nowhere in the record is it said definitively whether the late Ms. Cherry died testate or intestate. Plaintiff shall supplement the record NOT LATER THAN August 14, 2013, advis
Summary: ORDER JOE B. BROWN, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the court is NPC's motion to vacate and dismiss. (DE 6627; Related Case 47) Although plaintiff discusses Texas law tangentially in his response to NPC's motion with respect to the rights of "heirs" when a decedent dies intestate (DE 6727, pp. 7-8; Related Case 51), nowhere in the record is it said definitively whether the late Ms. Cherry died testate or intestate. Plaintiff shall supplement the record NOT LATER THAN August 14, 2013, advisi..
More
ORDER
JOE B. BROWN, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is NPC's motion to vacate and dismiss. (DE 6627; Related Case 47) Although plaintiff discusses Texas law tangentially in his response to NPC's motion with respect to the rights of "heirs" when a decedent dies intestate (DE 6727, pp. 7-8; Related Case 51), nowhere in the record is it said definitively whether the late Ms. Cherry died testate or intestate. Plaintiff shall supplement the record NOT LATER THAN August 14, 2013, advising the court whether the late Ms. Cherry died testate or intestate.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
