Filed: Nov. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS (ECF DOC. # 63 (FIRST REQUEST) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . On November 1, 2016, Defendants filed their Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (ECF Doc.# 63). The current deadline for Plaintiffs to file their response is November 15, 2016. The parties hereto, by and through the undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for plaintiffs to
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS (ECF DOC. # 63 (FIRST REQUEST) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . On November 1, 2016, Defendants filed their Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (ECF Doc.# 63). The current deadline for Plaintiffs to file their response is November 15, 2016. The parties hereto, by and through the undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for plaintiffs to r..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS (ECF DOC. # 63
(FIRST REQUEST)
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
On November 1, 2016, Defendants filed their Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (ECF Doc.# 63). The current deadline for Plaintiffs to file their response is November 15, 2016.
The parties hereto, by and through the undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for plaintiffs to respond by one day, to November 16, 2016. The parties additionally agree to extend the deadline for Defendants to file any reply to Plaintiffs' response by one judicial day, from November 25, 2016 to November 28, 2016.
This is the first request for an extension of this deadline. The reason for the requested extension is that the parties were in Florida for the deposition of Plaintiff's expert, which was conducted on November 14, and, due to travel schedules, Plaintiffs require one additional day to finalize their response to the Defendants' motion.
The motion has not been set for hearing. Accordingly, the parties believe that extending the response and reply deadlines by a single day will not prejudice any party or the Court's schedule.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
