U.S. v. Craig, 1:16-CR-145-1-TWT. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20181019j80
Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR. , District Judge . This is a criminal RICO action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 1215] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Defendant's Motions to Suppress [Doc. 731 & 948], Motion for Bill of Particulars [Doc. 732], Motion for Severance [Doc. 949], Motion for Disclosure of Confidential Informants [Doc. 950] and Motion for Accelerated Disclosure of Jencks Act and Giglio Materials [Doc. 951]. Notwithstanding who consente
Summary: ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR. , District Judge . This is a criminal RICO action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 1215] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Defendant's Motions to Suppress [Doc. 731 & 948], Motion for Bill of Particulars [Doc. 732], Motion for Severance [Doc. 949], Motion for Disclosure of Confidential Informants [Doc. 950] and Motion for Accelerated Disclosure of Jencks Act and Giglio Materials [Doc. 951]. Notwithstanding who consented..
More
ORDER
THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., District Judge.
This is a criminal RICO action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 1215] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Defendant's Motions to Suppress [Doc. 731 & 948], Motion for Bill of Particulars [Doc. 732], Motion for Severance [Doc. 949], Motion for Disclosure of Confidential Informants [Doc. 950] and Motion for Accelerated Disclosure of Jencks Act and Giglio Materials [Doc. 951]. Notwithstanding who consented to the law enforcement search of the residence in Marrero, Louisiana, the Magistrate Judge correctly found that the Defendant had alleged no facts showing an expectation of privacy on the part of the Defendant in the premises. Therefore, the Defendant has no standing to contest the search. The Magistrate Judge's analysis of the other motions was correct and the Court overrules the Defendant's conclusory objections. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defendant's Motions to Suppress [Doc. 731 & 948], Motion for Bill of Particulars [Doc. 732], Motion for Severance [Doc. 949], Motion for Disclosure of Confidential Informants [Doc. 950] and Motion for Accelerated Disclosure of Jencks Act and Giglio Materials [Doc. 951] are DENIED
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
