In re Fluoroquinolone Products Liability Litigation, 15-2642 (JRT). (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20180905893
Filed: Sep. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. TUNHEIM , Chief District Judge . Plaintiffs have moved to strike general liability and causation opinions from Defendants' case specific expert reports. Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike General Liability and Causation Opinions from Defendants' Case Specific Expert Reports [Docket No. 677] is DENIED. However, the Court warns that it will not permit redundant testimony regarding general liabili
Summary: ORDER JOHN R. TUNHEIM , Chief District Judge . Plaintiffs have moved to strike general liability and causation opinions from Defendants' case specific expert reports. Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike General Liability and Causation Opinions from Defendants' Case Specific Expert Reports [Docket No. 677] is DENIED. However, the Court warns that it will not permit redundant testimony regarding general liabilit..
More
ORDER
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiffs have moved to strike general liability and causation opinions from Defendants' case specific expert reports. Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike General Liability and Causation Opinions from Defendants' Case Specific Expert Reports [Docket No. 677] is DENIED.
However, the Court warns that it will not permit redundant testimony regarding general liability and causation at trial. Any further disputes regarding the scope of such expert testimony and regarding any related exhibits will be resolved as they arise in pretrial motions or during trial.
Source: Leagle
