Nixon v. Rendon, 2:18-cv-120-DPM-BD. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190108615
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de nova review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Deere's recommendation, No 18, and overrules Nixon's objections, No 35. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Courts must view prisoners' requests for injunctive relief "with great caution because judicial restraint is especially called for in dealing with the complex and intractable problems of prison administration." Goff v. Harper, 60 F.3d 518 , 520 (8th Cir. 1995) (quotation omitted). Viewed wi
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de nova review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Deere's recommendation, No 18, and overrules Nixon's objections, No 35. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Courts must view prisoners' requests for injunctive relief "with great caution because judicial restraint is especially called for in dealing with the complex and intractable problems of prison administration." Goff v. Harper, 60 F.3d 518 , 520 (8th Cir. 1995) (quotation omitted). Viewed wit..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
On de nova review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Deere's recommendation, No 18, and overrules Nixon's objections, No 35. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Courts must view prisoners' requests for injunctive relief "with great caution because judicial restraint is especially called for in dealing with the complex and intractable problems of prison administration." Goff v. Harper, 60 F.3d 518, 520 (8th Cir. 1995) (quotation omitted). Viewed with that caution, Nixon's motion doesn't show that irreparable harm is likely without a preliminary injunction. It is therefore denied. No 16.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
