Filed: Apr. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2014
Summary: Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend the Expert Disclosures Deadline ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge. It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record the following: WHEREAS, the parties were served with Scheduling Order on December 17, 2013 in this matter; WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order provides that by April 14, 2014, the parties shall disclose their expert witnesses. WHEREAS, for the past thirty-six (36) days plaintiff's
Summary: Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend the Expert Disclosures Deadline ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge. It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record the following: WHEREAS, the parties were served with Scheduling Order on December 17, 2013 in this matter; WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order provides that by April 14, 2014, the parties shall disclose their expert witnesses. WHEREAS, for the past thirty-six (36) days plaintiff's ..
More
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend the Expert Disclosures Deadline
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record the following:
WHEREAS, the parties were served with Scheduling Order on December 17, 2013 in this matter;
WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order provides that by April 14, 2014, the parties shall disclose their expert witnesses.
WHEREAS, for the past thirty-six (36) days plaintiff's counsel has been trying to coordinate a mutually agreeable date to schedule an Independent Medical Examination with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("CDCR").
WHEREAS, in late February the CDCR's litigation coordinator, Ms. Ann Sheldon, informed plaintiff's counsel that due to plaintiff's custody status any visits would be non-contact.
WHEREAS, defense counsel has informed plaintiff's counsel that he needs to submit a written request to the Warden at the institution requesting an Independent Medical Examination, as required by Cal. Code Regs., tit.15, § 3354 (c).
WHEREAS, on April 1, 2014, it was brought to Plaintiff's counsel's attention that Mr. Barker was transferred to the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego.
THEREFORE, the Parties jointly stipulate and request that this Court enter an order as follows:
1. Due to the limited availability of Mr. Barker, Plaintiff request that expert disclosures be extended thirty (30) days for the sole purpose of allowing plaintiff to complete its IME.
2. Nothing in this Stipulation shall be construed to effect any other date set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order, as all other dates shall remain the same.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the date for Expert Disclosures under Rule 26(a)(2) be continued to May 14, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
