United States v. Garrison, 4:12-cr-40011 (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190910584
Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed August 12, 2019, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 81. Judge Bryant recommends that Movant Samuel B. Garrison's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to U.S.C. 2255 (ECF No. 73) be denied and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommen
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed August 12, 2019, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 81. Judge Bryant recommends that Movant Samuel B. Garrison's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to U.S.C. 2255 (ECF No. 73) be denied and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommend..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed August 12, 2019, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 81. Judge Bryant recommends that Movant Samuel B. Garrison's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 73) be denied and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, Garrison's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 73) is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Further, the Court finds that an appeal from dismissal would not be taken in good faith and that no certificate of appealability should be issued.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
