HAMILTON v. SINGLETON, 4:13-cv-4038. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150306672
Visitors: 28
Filed: Mar. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2015
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, Plaintiff's Motions for a Hearing (ECF Nos. 78, 79) are DENIED. Plaintiff's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 58) is DENIED. Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 54) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, Plaintiff's claims relating to Defendant Singleton's duty to pay for Plaintiff's surgery after Plaintiff was released and Plaintiff'
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, Plaintiff's Motions for a Hearing (ECF Nos. 78, 79) are DENIED. Plaintiff's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 58) is DENIED. Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 54) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, Plaintiff's claims relating to Defendant Singleton's duty to pay for Plaintiff's surgery after Plaintiff was released and Plaintiff's..
More
ORDER
BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, Plaintiff's Motions for a Hearing (ECF Nos. 78, 79) are DENIED. Plaintiff's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 58) is DENIED. Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 54) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, Plaintiff's claims relating to Defendant Singleton's duty to pay for Plaintiff's surgery after Plaintiff was released and Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claim that Defendant Singleton's action of releasing him rather than paying for his hand surgery was deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff and Plaintiff's claims for damages remain and will proceed to trial before a jury.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
