HATCHER v. WYNNE, 2:13-CV-226-WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160503917
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 02, 2016
Latest Update: May 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This cause is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on April 8, 2016 (Doc. #35). There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after a de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This cause is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on April 8, 2016 (Doc. #35). There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after a de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs a..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This cause is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on April 8, 2016 (Doc. #35). There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after a de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants.
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff.
5. Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
Source: Leagle
