Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

I.R. v. City of Fresno, 1:12-CV-00558-AWI-GSA (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140602877 Visitors: 27
Filed: May 30, 2014
Latest Update: May 30, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC. NOS. 24 & 71) GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge. THE PARTIES, plaintiffs I.R., H.R, Raul Rosas, Sr., and Eva Rosas and defendants City of Fresno, Miguel Alvarez, Sammy Ashworth, Troy Miller, County of Fresno, Christian Lightner, and Manuel Flores, through their respective counsel, have stipulated to modify the Scheduling Order issued on September 13, 2012 (Doc. No. 24) and the Ord
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER (DOC. NOS. 24 & 71)

GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.

THE PARTIES, plaintiffs I.R., H.R, Raul Rosas, Sr., and Eva Rosas and defendants City of Fresno, Miguel Alvarez, Sammy Ashworth, Troy Miller, County of Fresno, Christian Lightner, and Manuel Flores, through their respective counsel, have stipulated to modify the Scheduling Order issued on September 13, 2012 (Doc. No. 24) and the Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 71) issued on October 18, 2013 as they pertain to taking the deposition of Plaintiffs' police practices expert Roger A. Clark.

The current deadline for expert discovery is May 16, 2014. The parties stipulate that the discovery deadline be extended to June 3, 2014 just for taking the deposition of Plaintiffs' police practices expert Roger A. Clark on June 3, 2014. The parties further stipulate that the continuance of Roger A. Clark's deposition will in no way prejudice Defendants' ability to file a motion concerning Plaintiffs' expert Roger A. Clark.

ORDER

The above stipulation is adopted. This Court's Scheduling Order issued on September 13, 2012 (Doc. No. 24) and its Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 71) are modified nunc pro tunc in accordance with the above stipulation. All other dates and orders contained in the Scheduling Order issued on September 13, 2012 (Doc. No. 24) and in the October 18, 2013 Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 71) remain in full force and effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer