Shade v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:19-cv-1122-KJN. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191107a88
Visitors: 46
Filed: Nov. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE: CONSENT KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . The court's records show that plaintiff has not yet indicated whether she consents to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes. 28 U.S.C. 636(c); see also ECF No. 5, (Scheduling Order, requesting parties' designation regarding consent by September 26, 2019). Plaintiff is under no obligation to consent, but a consent/decline designation assists the court in determining how the action will be administratively proces
Summary: ORDER RE: CONSENT KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . The court's records show that plaintiff has not yet indicated whether she consents to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes. 28 U.S.C. 636(c); see also ECF No. 5, (Scheduling Order, requesting parties' designation regarding consent by September 26, 2019). Plaintiff is under no obligation to consent, but a consent/decline designation assists the court in determining how the action will be administratively process..
More
ORDER RE: CONSENT
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
The court's records show that plaintiff has not yet indicated whether she consents to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); see also ECF No. 5, (Scheduling Order, requesting parties' designation regarding consent by September 26, 2019). Plaintiff is under no obligation to consent, but a consent/decline designation assists the court in determining how the action will be administratively processed. Accordingly, within fourteen (14) days of this order, plaintiff shall file a brief statement indicating whether she consents to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge for all purposes, including the entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); see ECF No. 5-2 (Consent Form).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
