JOHNSON v. ASTRUE, 2:12-cv-02004. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120717754
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge. Before this Court is Defendant's Motion to Reverse and Remand. ECF No. 15. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge to conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including conducting the trial, ordering the entry of a final judgment, and conducting all post-judgment proceedings. ECF No. 14. Pursuant to this authority, this Court issues this Memorandum Opinion. On June 6, 2012, Defendant filed the present Mot
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge. Before this Court is Defendant's Motion to Reverse and Remand. ECF No. 15. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge to conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including conducting the trial, ordering the entry of a final judgment, and conducting all post-judgment proceedings. ECF No. 14. Pursuant to this authority, this Court issues this Memorandum Opinion. On June 6, 2012, Defendant filed the present Moti..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge.
Before this Court is Defendant's Motion to Reverse and Remand. ECF No. 15. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge to conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including conducting the trial, ordering the entry of a final judgment, and conducting all post-judgment proceedings. ECF No. 14. Pursuant to this authority, this Court issues this Memorandum Opinion.
On June 6, 2012, Defendant filed the present Motion. ECF No. 15. Defendant seeks a remand pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. Id. This Court has contacted Plaintiff's counsel, and Plaintiff has no objections to this Motion. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Reverse and Remand (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED. A judgment incorporating these findings will be entered pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 52 and 58.
Source: Leagle
