THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24

MEMORANDUM DECISION

HALL, Judge.

¶ 1 Leya Marie Hillan (defendant) appeals from her convictions and the sentences imposed. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

¶ 2 Defendant's appellate counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Leon, 104 Ariz. 297, 451 P.2d 878 (1969), advising that, after a diligent search of the record, he was unable to find any arguable grounds for reversal. This court granted defendant an opportunity to file a supplemental brief, which she has not done. See State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530, 537, ¶ 30, 2 P.3d 89, 96 (App. 1999).

¶ 3 We review for fundamental error, error that goes to the foundation of a case or takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense. See State v. King, 158 Ariz. 419, 424, 763 P.2d 239, 244 (1988). We view the evidence presented at trial in a light most favorable to sustaining the verdict. State v. Cropper, 205 Ariz. 181, 182, ¶ 2, 68 P.3d 407, 408 (2003).

¶ 4 On March 3, 2009, defendant was charged by indictment with count one: taking identity of another, a class four felony, and count two: aggravated taking identity of another, a class three felony.

¶ 5 The following evidence was presented at trial.

¶ 6 On December 15, 2007, an employee of J.C. Penney's contacted Michelle N. to verify a withdrawal on her account. Michelle responded that she did not authorize the account to be opened. After checking online, Michelle discovered that "ten accounts were opened in [her] name," including an Apple account. Michelle contacted Apple to cancel the account, but was informed that a camera and an IPod had already been shipped to an address in her neighborhood.

¶ 7 Michelle contacted the Gilbert Police Department and Detective Garth McClellan was assigned to investigate. On December 18, 2007, Detective McClellan obtained a search warrant for defendant's residence. During the search, the detective found a FedEx box containing manuals for a Canon camera and the order slip, checkbooks in the name of Christina W., a debit card and driver license in the name of Courtney L., and an overdraft notice in the name of Connie and James S. Detective McClellan then placed defendant under arrest.

¶ 8 Courtney L., Christine W., and Connie S. testified that they did not know defendant and that she was not authorized to have financial documents in their names.

¶ 9 After a three-day trial, the jury found defendant guilty as charged. Defendant stipulated to one prior felony conviction.1 The trial court sentenced defendant to a mitigated term of 2.25 years on count one and a mitigated term of 3.5 years on count two to be served concurrently with count one. Defendant was given 34 days of presentence incarceration credit.

¶ 10 We have read and considered counsel's brief and have searched the entire record for reversible error. See Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300, 451 P.2d at 881. We find none. All of the proceedings were conducted in compliance with the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant was given an opportunity to speak before sentencing, and the sentences imposed were within statutory limits. Furthermore, based on our review of the record, there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that defendant committed the offenses for which she was convicted.

¶ 11 After the filing of this decision, counsel's obligations pertaining to defendant's representation in this appeal have ended. Counsel need do no more than inform defendant of the status of the appeal and her future options, unless counsel's review reveals an issue appropriate for submission to the Arizona Supreme Court by petition for review. See State v. Shattuck, 140 Ariz. 582, 584-85, 684 P.2d 154, 156-57 (1984). Defendant has thirty days from the date of this decision to proceed, if she desires, with a pro per motion for reconsideration or petition for review. Accordingly, defendant's convictions and sentences are affirmed.

PATRICIA A. OROZCO, Presiding Judge, JOHN C. GEMMILL, Judge, concurring.