Bardwell v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:18-CV-0293-DMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180921996
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On August 10, 2018, the court directed plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to notify the court regarding consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. A review of the docket reflects that plaintiff has now complied. The order to show cau
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On August 10, 2018, the court directed plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to notify the court regarding consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. A review of the docket reflects that plaintiff has now complied. The order to show caus..
More
ORDER
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On August 10, 2018, the court directed plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to notify the court regarding consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. A review of the docket reflects that plaintiff has now complied. The order to show cause is, therefore, discharged.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
