Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

I.R. v. City of Fresno, 1:12-CV-00558-AWI-GSA (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140502g43 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO DESIGNATE A REBUTTAL EXPERT (DOC. NOS. 24, 71 & 97) GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge. THE PARTIES, plaintiffs I.R., H.R, Raul Rosas, Sr., and Eva Rosas and defendants City of Fresno, Miguel Alvarez, Sammy Ashworth, Troy Miller, County of Fresno, Christian Lightner, and Manuel Flores, through their respectiv
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO DESIGNATE A REBUTTAL EXPERT (DOC. NOS. 24, 71 & 97)

GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.

THE PARTIES, plaintiffs I.R., H.R, Raul Rosas, Sr., and Eva Rosas and defendants City of Fresno, Miguel Alvarez, Sammy Ashworth, Troy Miller, County of Fresno, Christian Lightner, and Manuel Flores, through their respective counsel, have stipulated in accordance with Magistrate Judge Austin's Order Granting Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time to Designate a Rebuttal Expert (Doc. No. 97), to modify the Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 24) and Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 71) only as it pertains to taking the deposition of the individual Plaintiffs designate as a rebuttal expert on the defense of excited delirium.

The current deadline for expert discovery is May 16, 2014. The parties stipulate that the discovery deadline be extended to June 6, 2014 just as to deposing the foregoing individual.

ORDER

The above stipulation is adopted. This Court's Scheduling Order issued on September 13, 2012 (Doc. No. 24) and its Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 71) are modified in accordance with the above stipulation and this Court's Order Granting Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time to Designate a Rebuttal Expert (Doc. No. 97). All other dates and orders contained in the Scheduling Order issued on September 13, 2012 (Doc. No. 24) and in the October 18, 2013 Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 71) remain in full force and effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer