Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SANDERS v. COLVIN, 2:13CV00040-JJV. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20130816e14 Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 15, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2013
Summary: ORDER JOE J. VOLPE, Magistrate Judge. Defendant has filed an Unopposed Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 12) this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (1995): The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (1995). The Commissioner seeks remand for further development of
More

ORDER

JOE J. VOLPE, Magistrate Judge.

Defendant has filed an Unopposed Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 12) this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1995):

The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.

42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1995).

The Commissioner seeks remand for further development of the record and to issue a new decision. Defendant states that Plaintiff's attorney was contacted and stated that he had no objection to the requested remand. Under the circumstances, a sentence four remand is appropriate. Buckner v. Apfel, 213 F.3d 1006, 1010-11 (8th Cir. 2000).

Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision is reversed and remanded for action consistent with this Order. This is a "sentence four" remand within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer