Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

APELT v. RYAN, CV-98-00882-PHX-ROS. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20120523f28 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 23, 2012
Latest Update: May 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER, District Judge. There being no opposition, IT IS ORDERED Petitioner's Motion for Supplemental Briefing (Doc. 311) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting the following briefing schedule: 1. No later than July 30, 2012, Petitioner shall file a supplemental brief addressing: (1) whether under Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S.Ct. 1309 (2011), Petitioner has cause to excuse the procedural default of Claims 1-B, 1-D, and 12; and (2) the merits of Claims 1-B, 1-D, and 12.
More

ORDER

ROSLYN O. SILVER, District Judge.

There being no opposition,

IT IS ORDERED Petitioner's Motion for Supplemental Briefing (Doc. 311) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting the following briefing schedule:

1. No later than July 30, 2012, Petitioner shall file a supplemental brief addressing: (1) whether under Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S.Ct. 1309 (2011), Petitioner has cause to excuse the procedural default of Claims 1-B, 1-D, and 12; and (2) the merits of Claims 1-B, 1-D, and 12. The merits portion of the brief shall include a discussion of the applicable standards of review and shall also include any requests for evidentiary development, including identification of the evidence or facts sought to be developed and the applicable standards governing evidentiary development.

2. No later than September 14, 2012, Respondents shall file a response to Petitioner's supplemental brief.

3. No later than October 15, 2012, Petitioner shall file a reply.

4. The Court's courtesy copy of any brief in excess of 50 pages shall be spiral bound on the left and shall include a table of contents, an exhibits list (if any), and tabs between exhibits (if any).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer