RICHARD v. TALLANT, 4:14-cv-04027. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160519916
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 18, 2016
Latest Update: May 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Louis Edward Richard, filed this case pro se pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 1983 case. ECF No. 1. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge to conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including conducting the trial, ordering the entry of a final judgment, and conducting all post-judgment proceedings. ECF No. 16. Pursuant to this authority, I held a bench trial on May 13, 2016. After thorough
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Louis Edward Richard, filed this case pro se pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 1983 case. ECF No. 1. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge to conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including conducting the trial, ordering the entry of a final judgment, and conducting all post-judgment proceedings. ECF No. 16. Pursuant to this authority, I held a bench trial on May 13, 2016. After thoroughl..
More
ORDER
BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Louis Edward Richard, filed this case pro se pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case. ECF No. 1. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge to conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including conducting the trial, ordering the entry of a final judgment, and conducting all post-judgment proceedings. ECF No. 16.
Pursuant to this authority, I held a bench trial on May 13, 2016. After thoroughly considering all of the evidence presented and arguments made, I issued findings of fact and conclusion of law from the bench. In accordance with these findings and conclusions, I dismissed Plaintiff's claims against Jana Tallant with prejudice.
Accordingly, I now issue this Judgment. Plaintiff Louis Edward Richard's claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Jana Tallant is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
