Khan v. Barr, 2:19-cv-399 TLN KJN. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190517a76
Visitors: 34
Filed: May 15, 2019
Latest Update: May 15, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Defendants seek an additional 45 days in which to file an answer to the complaint or other dispositive pleading, and plaintiff does not object. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that the defendants' answer will be due on June 28, 2019. Dated May 14, 2019 Respectfully submitted, McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney s/Audrey B. Hemesath AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Defendants seek an additional 45 days in which to file an answer to the complaint or other dispositive pleading, and plaintiff does not object. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that the defendants' answer will be due on June 28, 2019. Dated May 14, 2019 Respectfully submitted, McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney s/Audrey B. Hemesath AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Defendants seek an additional 45 days in which to file an answer to the complaint or other dispositive pleading, and plaintiff does not object. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that the defendants' answer will be due on June 28, 2019.
Dated May 14, 2019 Respectfully submitted,
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
s/Audrey B. Hemesath
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
s/Wahida Noorzad
WAHIDA NOORZAD
Attorney for the Plaintiff
ORDER
It is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
