U.S. v. Larsen, 2:15-cr-00190-GEB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181004e56
Visitors: 25
Filed: Oct. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2018
Summary: Order GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , Senior District Judge . The parties filed a stipulation on October 1, 2018, which is construed as their agreement that Defendant George Larsen's appellate counsel may obtain a transcript of the December 8, 2017 in camera hearing prepared for whatever costs is applicable to his ordering of and receipt of the transcript. The court reporter is authorized to prepare the referenced transcript of the December 8, 2017 in camera hearing and to provide a copy to Mr. L
Summary: Order GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , Senior District Judge . The parties filed a stipulation on October 1, 2018, which is construed as their agreement that Defendant George Larsen's appellate counsel may obtain a transcript of the December 8, 2017 in camera hearing prepared for whatever costs is applicable to his ordering of and receipt of the transcript. The court reporter is authorized to prepare the referenced transcript of the December 8, 2017 in camera hearing and to provide a copy to Mr. La..
More
Order
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., Senior District Judge.
The parties filed a stipulation on October 1, 2018, which is construed as their agreement that Defendant George Larsen's appellate counsel may obtain a transcript of the December 8, 2017 in camera hearing prepared for whatever costs is applicable to his ordering of and receipt of the transcript. The court reporter is authorized to prepare the referenced transcript of the December 8, 2017 in camera hearing and to provide a copy to Mr. Larsen's appellate counsel Kurt Hermansen.
Further, George Larsen shall show cause as soon as practical after review of the transcript why the transcript should not be made available on the public docket as such transcripts are typically filed. Cf. United States v. Seugasala, 670 F. App'x 641, 641 (9th Cir. 2016) (unpublished) ("The district court ha[s] . . . inherent discretionary power to seal or unseal record items . . . for the purpose of maximizing judicial economy [and] aid[ing the appellate court] in [its] review.").
Source: Leagle
