Garcia v. City of Fresno, 1:16-cv-01340-LJO-SAB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180413a11
Visitors: 25
Filed: Apr. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . The Court is in receipt of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, see ECF Nos. 48-49, and upon review of the record recognizes that Plaintiff Roseanne Garcia did not participate in meet and confer efforts or file an opposition or statement of non-opposition with regard to the summary judgment motion. This therefore indicates a failure to prosecute claims. Plaintiff
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . The Court is in receipt of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, see ECF Nos. 48-49, and upon review of the record recognizes that Plaintiff Roseanne Garcia did not participate in meet and confer efforts or file an opposition or statement of non-opposition with regard to the summary judgment motion. This therefore indicates a failure to prosecute claims. Plaintiff G..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
The Court is in receipt of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, see ECF Nos. 48-49, and upon review of the record recognizes that Plaintiff Roseanne Garcia did not participate in meet and confer efforts or file an opposition or statement of non-opposition with regard to the summary judgment motion. This therefore indicates a failure to prosecute claims. Plaintiff Garcia is ordered to show cause no later than twenty (20) days from the filing of this order why her claims should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
