Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Stoltzner v. Berryhill, 1:16-cv-01490-EPG. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170505922 Visitors: 1
Filed: May 04, 2017
Latest Update: May 04, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . TO THE HONORABLE ERICA P. GROSJEAN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: Plaintiff Andy D. Stoltzner ("Plaintiff") and defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant"), through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate, pursuant to the Court's Scheduling Order, to extend the time for Plaintiff to provide Defendant with Plaintiff's Settlement Letter Brief to
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE ERICA P. GROSJEAN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:

Plaintiff Andy D. Stoltzner ("Plaintiff") and defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant"), through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate, pursuant to the Court's Scheduling Order, to extend the time for Plaintiff to provide Defendant with Plaintiff's Settlement Letter Brief to May 2, 2017; and that Defendant shall have until June 6, 2017, to provide a response.

As the Court is aware, after a 5 year battle with terminal stage 4 cancer Plaintiff's Spouse passed away on September 30, 2016. The aftermath of this traumatic event on both Counsel and his 9 year old son and 7 year old daughter was immeasurable. Compounding the impact of this loss is the fact that Counsel's spouse was a former employee at Counsel's Law Firm and her death was far reaching in its impact on Counsel's professional life as well. Due to the death, the subsequent holiday period, and the need to find a permanent caregiver and the required time to acclimate his children to that presence during his absence to meet his professional obligations, Counsel required the additional time to prepare and provide Defendant with Plaintiff's Settlement Letter Brief.

Counsel for plaintiff does not anticipate this extraordinary request for more time to become the rule and recognizes it is the extraordinary exception and sincerely apologizes to the court for any inconvenience this may have had upon it or its staff.

Order

Based on the above stipulation and good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff may have an extension of time for Plaintiff to provide Defendant with Plaintiff's Settlement Letter Brief to and including May 2, 2017; Defendant may have an extension of time to June 6, 2017 to file her response. All other deadlines in the scheduling order are modified accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer