U.S. v. Eguilos, 2:18-cv-00399-WBS-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190423902
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ANSWER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between Plaintiff United States of America and Defendant Christian Oribello Eguilos (jointly, "Parties") that the Defendant's Answer to the Complaint, currently due on April 30, 2019, may be continued to May 30, 2019. On April 16, 2019, the Parties received the Court's Memorandum and Order regarding the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Defense counsel requires add
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ANSWER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between Plaintiff United States of America and Defendant Christian Oribello Eguilos (jointly, "Parties") that the Defendant's Answer to the Complaint, currently due on April 30, 2019, may be continued to May 30, 2019. On April 16, 2019, the Parties received the Court's Memorandum and Order regarding the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Defense counsel requires addi..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ANSWER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between Plaintiff United States of America and Defendant Christian Oribello Eguilos (jointly, "Parties") that the Defendant's Answer to the Complaint, currently due on April 30, 2019, may be continued to May 30, 2019.
On April 16, 2019, the Parties received the Court's Memorandum and Order regarding the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Defense counsel requires additional time to travel to Defendant's location to advise him of the Order and strategize regarding the Answer, and therefore respectfully requests the Court grant a 30 day extension on the filing of the Answer. Plaintiff does not object to this extension.
ORDER
The Court, having received and considered the Parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the Parties' stipulation in its entirety as its Order. The Court finds that a continuance is necessary for the reasons stated above. The deadline for filing the Defendant's answer is hereby set for May 30, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
