COOKE v. TOWN OF COLORADO CITY, CV-10-08105-PCT-JAT. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20150902574
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 01, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. TEILBORG , Senior District Judge . The Court notes that Plaintiff State of Arizona has filed a "Notice of Filing Form of Judgment" (Doc. 736). Because this filing is not a motion, the Court will not take any action on it. Moreover, the Court notes that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 58(a)(3), a judgment for an award of attorneys' fees is not required to be entered in a separate document. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a)(3). The State of Arizona is not entitled to
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. TEILBORG , Senior District Judge . The Court notes that Plaintiff State of Arizona has filed a "Notice of Filing Form of Judgment" (Doc. 736). Because this filing is not a motion, the Court will not take any action on it. Moreover, the Court notes that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 58(a)(3), a judgment for an award of attorneys' fees is not required to be entered in a separate document. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a)(3). The State of Arizona is not entitled to t..
More
ORDER
JAMES A. TEILBORG, Senior District Judge.
The Court notes that Plaintiff State of Arizona has filed a "Notice of Filing Form of Judgment" (Doc. 736). Because this filing is not a motion, the Court will not take any action on it.
Moreover, the Court notes that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 58(a)(3), a judgment for an award of attorneys' fees is not required to be entered in a separate document. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a)(3). The State of Arizona is not entitled to the entry of judgment in a separate document for the Court's award of attorneys' fees (Doc. 726). The Court has previously declined such a request. See United States v. Business Recovery Servs., LLC, 2012 WL 3064253 (D. Ariz. July 26, 2012). The State of Arizona has not shown that a separate document is necessary for the execution of the judgment.
Source: Leagle
