ORDER

STEVEN P. LOGAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Arizona Medical Billing, Inc. ("AMB"), filed suit against several defendants, including FSIX LLC, alleging that the defendants violated the Federal False Claims Act and Medicare's mileage reimbursement policies, among other causes of action. (Doc. 1) Certain defendants, FSIX LLC, Cindy Funk, and Todd Funk moved for an award of costs and attorneys' fees incurred in defending AMB's repeated filings (Doc. 24), which the Court granted in part on January 22, 2019. (Doc. 42) The Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration (the "Motion") on February 4, 2019. (Doc. 44) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

Reconsideration is disfavored and "appropriate only in rare circumstances." WildEarth Guardians v. United States Dep't of Justice, 283 F.Supp.3d 783, 795 n.11 (D. Ariz. June 21, 2017); see also Bergdale v. Countrywide Bank FSB, No. CV-12-8057-PCT-SMM, 2014 WL 12643162, at *2 (D. Ariz. May 23, 2014) ("[Reconsideration] motions should not be used for the purpose of asking a court to rethink what the court had already thought through-rightly or wrongly.") A motion for reconsideration will be granted only where the Court "(1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law." Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993).

In its Motion, Plaintiff requests for the Court to reconsider its prior Order. (Doc. 44 at 2) The Plaintiff does not direct the Court to any newly discovered evidence or precedent demonstrating an error or intervening change in controlling law.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 44) is denied.