Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HUSSAK v. RYAN, CV-15-00716-PHX-DLR. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20160509566 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 06, 2016
Latest Update: May 06, 2016
Summary: ORDER DOUGLAS L. RAYES , District Judge . Pending before the Court are Petitioner Martin Hussak's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Magistrate Judge John Boyle's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). (Docs. 1, 21.) The R&R recommends that the Court deny the Petition. (Doc. 21 at 15.) The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Petitioner Martin Hussak's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Magistrate Judge John Boyle's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). (Docs. 1, 21.) The R&R recommends that the Court deny the Petition. (Doc. 21 at 15.) The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. (Id. at 16 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).

Neither party filed objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) ("[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection."); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to."). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and agrees with Magistrate Judge Boyle's recommendations. The Court will accept the R&R and deny the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate"); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.").

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Boyle's R&R (Doc. 21) is ACCEPTED, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED, a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED, and Petitioner may not proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Clerk shall terminate this action.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer