Filed: Aug. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER, Senior District Judge. On July 1, 2014, Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. 17). No objections were filed. A district judge Amay accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. ` 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's R&R, the district court's review of
Summary: ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER, Senior District Judge. On July 1, 2014, Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. 17). No objections were filed. A district judge Amay accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. ` 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's R&R, the district court's review of t..
More
ORDER
ROSLYN O. SILVER, Senior District Judge.
On July 1, 2014, Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. 17). No objections were filed.
A district judge Amay accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. ` 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's R&R, the district court's review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are filed, the district court need not conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). No objections were filed and the R&R will be adopted in full.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) is ADOPTED and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because the dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable.
