Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Stanfield v. City of Fresno, 1:14-cv-01389-DAD-BAM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190502d86 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 01, 2019
Latest Update: May 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER (Doc. No. 36) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On August 9, 2018, the undersigned issued a minute order in this stayed action. The order directed the parties to file a joint status report on or before August 23, 2018, and thereafter to file joint status reports every 90 days. (Doc. No. 36.) The parties proceeded to file a joint status report on August 13, 2018 (Doc. No. 37), however a review of the do
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

(Doc. No. 36)

On August 9, 2018, the undersigned issued a minute order in this stayed action. The order directed the parties to file a joint status report on or before August 23, 2018, and thereafter to file joint status reports every 90 days. (Doc. No. 36.) The parties proceeded to file a joint status report on August 13, 2018 (Doc. No. 37), however a review of the docket indicates that no status report has been filed since that time. It has now been well over 90 days since the last status report was filed.

Accordingly, the parties are hereby ordered to show cause in writing within seven days from the date of service of this order why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to obey the court's minute order issued on August 9, 2018. This order to show cause will be satisfied by the parties' filing of the required status report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer