Telnas v. Berryhill, 1:16-cv-00583-EPG. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170510883
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 08, 2017
Latest Update: May 08, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended from May 8, 2017 to June 7, 2017. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because Defendant's counsel will be on leave from May 6 to
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended from May 8, 2017 to June 7, 2017. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because Defendant's counsel will be on leave from May 6 to M..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended from May 8, 2017 to June 7, 2017. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because Defendant's counsel will be on leave from May 6 to May 10.
The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly: Plaintiff's optional reply will be due within 15 days of the filing of Defendant's brief (on or before June 22, 2017).
ORDER
For the reasons provided in the parties' stipulation, good cause appears for an extension of time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief from May 8, 2017 to June 7, 2017. All other deadlines are extended accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source: Leagle
