Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Maxwell v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-00894-GSA. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190319842 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION & ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Defendant shall have a 32-day extension of time, from March 21, 2019 to April 22, 2019, to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectful
More

STIPULATION & ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel of record, with the Court's approval, that Defendant shall have a 32-day extension of time, from March 21, 2019 to April 22, 2019, to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.

This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits that good cause exists for the requested extension because additional time is needed to review and evaluate the administrative record, to consider the issues raised in Plaintiff's Opening Brief, to determine whether options exist for settlement, and to prepare Defendant's response if settlement is not possible. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant's request for an extension of time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer