HUGGARD v. UNITED PERFORMANCE METALS, INC., 1:10cv63. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120207746
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 03, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on December 28, 2011 (Doc. 63), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired January 17, 2012, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for substitution (Doc. 54) is
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on December 28, 2011 (Doc. 63), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired January 17, 2012, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for substitution (Doc. 54) is ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on December 28, 2011 (Doc. 63), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired January 17, 2012, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Plaintiff's motion for substitution (Doc. 54) is GRANTED and the Estate of James Huggard, c/o Maggie Hess, Executrix, is substituted as plaintiff in this litigation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
