HASTINGS v. THOMAS, 2:13-cv-418-MEF. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20130806601
Visitors: 27
Filed: Aug. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2013
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. On July 8, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #34) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The motion for preliminary injunction filed by the plaintiff is DENIED and this case
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. On July 8, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #34) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The motion for preliminary injunction filed by the plaintiff is DENIED and this case i..
More
ORDER
MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.
On July 8, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #34) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The motion for preliminary injunction filed by the plaintiff is DENIED and this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings.
Source: Leagle
