SANDOVAL-VEGA v. HOBBS, 5:13CV00170-BSM. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130314a34
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Sandoval-Vega's Petition [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed with prejudice. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 2253 and Rule 11 of th
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Sandoval-Vega's Petition [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed with prejudice. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 2253 and Rule 11 of the..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Sandoval-Vega's Petition [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed with prejudice. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2554 Cases, a certificate of appealability will not be issued because Sandoval-Vega has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
