Harris v. Brock, 19-0044-KD-MU. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190424758
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and dated April 5, 2019, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, Defendant Walter Lee Brock's Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (doc. 6) is
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE , Chief District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and dated April 5, 2019, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, Defendant Walter Lee Brock's Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (doc. 6) is G..
More
ORDER
KRISTI K. DuBOSE, Chief District Judge.
After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated April 5, 2019, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, Defendant Walter Lee Brock's Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (doc. 6) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (doc. 13) is DENIED.
Done and Ordered.
Source: Leagle
