In re Roundup Products Liability Litigation, 16-md-02741-VC (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190208c30
Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2019
Summary: PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 72: PROCEDURE FOR CERTAIN MOTIONS TO REMAND VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . In light of Pretrial Order 69, see Dkt. No. 2639, any plaintiff who plans to file a motion to remand on the basis that 28 U.S.C. 1441(b)(2) governs defendants who have not yet been served may file it in accordance with the procedures governing administrative motions under Civil Local Rule 7-11. Any opposition must be filed no later than 4 days after the motion has been filed and, unless othe
Summary: PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 72: PROCEDURE FOR CERTAIN MOTIONS TO REMAND VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . In light of Pretrial Order 69, see Dkt. No. 2639, any plaintiff who plans to file a motion to remand on the basis that 28 U.S.C. 1441(b)(2) governs defendants who have not yet been served may file it in accordance with the procedures governing administrative motions under Civil Local Rule 7-11. Any opposition must be filed no later than 4 days after the motion has been filed and, unless other..
More
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 72: PROCEDURE FOR CERTAIN MOTIONS TO REMAND
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
In light of Pretrial Order 69, see Dkt. No. 2639, any plaintiff who plans to file a motion to remand on the basis that 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2) governs defendants who have not yet been served may file it in accordance with the procedures governing administrative motions under Civil Local Rule 7-11. Any opposition must be filed no later than 4 days after the motion has been filed and, unless otherwise ordered, the motion will then be deemed submitted for determination without a hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
