Brown v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., 3:18-cv-00704. (2020)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20200122i21
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2020
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 19). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. No. 25) and Defendant filed a reply (Doc. No. 28). For the reasons discussed is the accompanying memorandum, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Argument (Doc. No. 30) is DENIED. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 19). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. No. 25) and Defendant filed a reply (Doc. No. 28). For the reasons discussed is the accompanying memorandum, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Argument (Doc. No. 30) is DENIED. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 19). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. No. 25) and Defendant filed a reply (Doc. No. 28). For the reasons discussed is the accompanying memorandum, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Argument (Doc. No. 30) is DENIED.
This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
