GOODNER v. SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 4:14-cv-04013. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160122610
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is the Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Pending Settlement Discussions. (ECF No. 40). Defendant has joined in the Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 41). The Court finds this matter ripe for its consideration. This case was removed to this Court on January 10, 2014. (ECF No. 1). Since that time, the case has been stayed pending settlement discussions on February 24, 2014 (ECF No. 20), August 11, 2014 (ECF No. 30), December 15, 2014 (ECF No. 33), Ma
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is the Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Pending Settlement Discussions. (ECF No. 40). Defendant has joined in the Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 41). The Court finds this matter ripe for its consideration. This case was removed to this Court on January 10, 2014. (ECF No. 1). Since that time, the case has been stayed pending settlement discussions on February 24, 2014 (ECF No. 20), August 11, 2014 (ECF No. 30), December 15, 2014 (ECF No. 33), Mar..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Pending Settlement Discussions. (ECF No. 40). Defendant has joined in the Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 41). The Court finds this matter ripe for its consideration. This case was removed to this Court on January 10, 2014. (ECF No. 1). Since that time, the case has been stayed pending settlement discussions on February 24, 2014 (ECF No. 20), August 11, 2014 (ECF No. 30), December 15, 2014 (ECF No. 33), March 16, 2015 (ECF No. 35), and July 30, 2015 (ECF No. 37). The parties now request an additional stay pending settlement discussions.
Upon consideration, the Court finds that a stay in this case for additional settlement discussions is unnecessary. The parties have had sufficient time for settlement discussions in this case which have apparently been unsuccessful. Accordingly, the motion should be and hereby is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
