Gardner v. Starkist Co., 19-cv-02561-WHO. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190821a43
Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT STARKIST CO.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (L.R. 6-2) WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Having read and considered the Stipulated Request for Order Modifying Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date for Defendant StarKist Co.'s Motion to Dismiss, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court GRANTS the parties' stipulated request. Plaintiffs shall have until September 13, 2019 to respond
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT STARKIST CO.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (L.R. 6-2) WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Having read and considered the Stipulated Request for Order Modifying Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date for Defendant StarKist Co.'s Motion to Dismiss, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court GRANTS the parties' stipulated request. Plaintiffs shall have until September 13, 2019 to respond t..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT STARKIST CO.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (L.R. 6-2)
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Having read and considered the Stipulated Request for Order Modifying Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date for Defendant StarKist Co.'s Motion to Dismiss, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court GRANTS the parties' stipulated request. Plaintiffs shall have until September 13, 2019 to respond to StarKist's Motion to Dismiss and Request for Judicial Notice and StarKist shall have until October 11, 2019 to reply regarding same. The Court shall hear StarKist's Motion on November 6, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle