Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re Roundup Products Liability Litigation, 16-md-02741-VC. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190809a94 Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2019
Summary: PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 172: DENYING PENDING MOTIONS TO ACTIONS SEAL Re Case 16-md-02741-VC, Dkt. Nos. 2413, 2414, 2415, 2416, 2421, 2478, 2491, 2493, 2495, 2524, 2528, 2558, 2587, 2606, 2608, 2609, 2703, 2862 Re Case 16-cv-00525-VC, Dkt. No. 143 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . As previously explained, the Court is of the view that all pending motions to seal should be denied and all items on the docket for which a motion to seal is pending should be unsealed. See Pretrial Order No. 168, D
More

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 172: DENYING PENDING MOTIONS TO ACTIONS SEAL

Re Case 16-md-02741-VC, Dkt. Nos. 2413, 2414, 2415, 2416, 2421, 2478, 2491, 2493, 2495, 2524, 2528, 2558, 2587, 2606, 2608, 2609, 2703, 2862

Re Case 16-cv-00525-VC, Dkt. No. 143

As previously explained, the Court is of the view that all pending motions to seal should be denied and all items on the docket for which a motion to seal is pending should be unsealed. See Pretrial Order No. 168, Dkt. No. 4655. The parties were given 14 days to file a response if they were in disagreement with this course of action, and no party filed a response. Accordingly, all pending motions to seal are denied, and the items on the docket are unsealed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer