Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Roark-Whitten Hospitality 2, LP, 1:14-cv-00884-MCA-LF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20171201c71
Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2017
Summary: AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO , Chief District Judge . The Magistrate Judge filed her Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition on November 2, 2017. Doc. 187. The proposed findings notified the parties of their ability to file objections within fourteen (14) days, and that failure to do so waived appellate review. Id . at 11. To date, the parties have not filed any objections, and there is nothing in the rec
Summary: AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO , Chief District Judge . The Magistrate Judge filed her Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition on November 2, 2017. Doc. 187. The proposed findings notified the parties of their ability to file objections within fourteen (14) days, and that failure to do so waived appellate review. Id . at 11. To date, the parties have not filed any objections, and there is nothing in the reco..
More
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
M. CHRISTINA ARMIJO, Chief District Judge.
The Magistrate Judge filed her Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition on November 2, 2017. Doc. 187. The proposed findings notified the parties of their ability to file objections within fourteen (14) days, and that failure to do so waived appellate review. Id. at 11. To date, the parties have not filed any objections, and there is nothing in the record indicating that the proposed findings were not delivered.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 187) are adopted;
2. Plaintiff EEOC's Motion for Civil Contempt of Court Against Defendant Roark Whitten 2, LP, and Defendant Jai Hanuman, LLC, (Doc. 181), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
a. The EEOC's request for the Court to issue an order to show cause as to why defendants should not be held in contempt and a finding of contempt as to defendants Roark Whitten 2, LP, and Jai Hanuman, LLC, is DENIED.
b. The EEOC's request for an order for default judgment against defendants Roark Whitten 2, LP and Jai Hanuman, LLC, is GRANTED
3. Judgment by default on all issues of liability is entered in favor of the plaintiff EEOC against defendants Roark-Whitten Hospitality 2, LP, and Jai Hanuman, LLC; and
4. A hearing under Rule 55(b)(2) for the purpose of determining the amount of damages for which defendants Roark-Whitten Hospitality 2, LP, and Jai Hanuman, LLC, are liable, and whether any injunctive relief is appropriate, will be set by a separate notice of this Court.
Source: Leagle
