IN RE AREDIA AND ZOMETA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 3-06-MD-1760. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20130617910
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 14, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2013
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No.6630), Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No. 6711), and Defendant's Response to Objections (Docket No. 6734). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, the Response to Objections and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are ov
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No.6630), Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No. 6711), and Defendant's Response to Objections (Docket No. 6734). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, the Response to Objections and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are ove..
More
ORDER
TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No.6630), Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No. 6711), and Defendant's Response to Objections (Docket No. 6734).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, the Response to Objections and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.
Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6391) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
