U.S. v. Ford, 3:15-cr-505-LSC-GMB. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180614670
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION L. SCOTT COOGLER , District Judge . On March 5, 2018, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the above-styled cause, recommending that the defendant's motion to set her restitution payment at $25 per quarter be denied. To date, no objections have been filed by either party. Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report
Summary: MEMORANDUM OF OPINION L. SCOTT COOGLER , District Judge . On March 5, 2018, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the above-styled cause, recommending that the defendant's motion to set her restitution payment at $25 per quarter be denied. To date, no objections have been filed by either party. Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report ..
More
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
L. SCOTT COOGLER, District Judge.
On March 5, 2018, the magistrate judge filed his report and recommendation in the above-styled cause, recommending that the defendant's motion to set her restitution payment at $25 per quarter be denied. To date, no objections have been filed by either party.
Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the defendant's motion (doc. 47) is hereby DENIED.
Source: Leagle
