Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lee v. Saul, 4:18-cv-453-DPM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20190725797 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2019
Summary: D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . The Government doesn't object to Lee's motion for an award of fees under 28 U.S.C. 2412(d). The hours and fees are reasonable. The unopposed motion, No. 17, is therefore granted. The Court awards a reasonable attorney's fee of $6,241.80, payable directly to Lee. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 , 591 (2010). The check should be mailed to Lee's lawyer. So Ordered.

The Government doesn't object to Lee's motion for an award of fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The hours and fees are reasonable. The unopposed motion, No. 17, is therefore granted. The Court awards a reasonable attorney's fee of $6,241.80, payable directly to Lee. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591 (2010). The check should be mailed to Lee's lawyer.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer