Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Blakely v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., 2:18-cv-01647-WBS-EFB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180727a78 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2018
Summary: CLASS ACTION ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Plaintiffs Vicki Blakely, Steven Lawson, Christy Mitchell, Leslie Williams, James Rolland, Jaynellis Salinas, Kathleen Jones, Annie Bluitt, Samuel Carter, and Kevin Grief ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc. ("SC"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, field a joint stipulation to stay this case pending appeal. Good cause therefor appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs and SC's J
More

CLASS ACTION

ORDER

Plaintiffs Vicki Blakely, Steven Lawson, Christy Mitchell, Leslie Williams, James Rolland, Jaynellis Salinas, Kathleen Jones, Annie Bluitt, Samuel Carter, and Kevin Grief ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc. ("SC"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, field a joint stipulation to stay this case pending appeal. Good cause therefor appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs and SC's Joint Stipulation to Stay Case Pending Appeal:

1. This case is stayed and all pending deadlines are vacated until resolution of Plaintiffs' pending appeal in the April Lindblom v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-00990-BAM, defined here as: (1) Plaintiffs' pending appeal to the Ninth Circuit of the Lindblom court's order denying motions to intervene in that case (Lindblom, Dkt. 153); (2) Plaintiffs' request for interlocutory appeal of the Lindblom court's orders (Lindblom, Dkt. 152); and (3) Plaintiffs' request to the Lindblom court to certify a question for appeal (the "Appeal");

2. Within 5 court days after final resolution of Plaintiffs' Appeal, Plaintiffs agree to file a notice of ruling notifying this Court of the disposition of the Appeal and the parties may, singularly or jointly, file a request to set a scheduling conference in this action.

3. WHEREAS, the parties agree that SC's response to Plaintiffs' Complaint shall not be due until at least thirty days after the filing of a notice of ruling on Plaintiffs' Appeal, except as otherwise ordered by the Court or stipulated to by the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer