NAYLOR v. FAISON, 2:13-CV-645-WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20160914779
Visitors: 24
Filed: Sep. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 12, 2016
Summary: OPINION and ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . On August 17, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Doc. 41. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants' motions for summary
Summary: OPINION and ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . On August 17, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Doc. 41. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants' motions for summary j..
More
OPINION and ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
On August 17, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Doc. 41. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. 14, 19, 23) are GRANTED;
2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice;
3. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendants and against the Plaintiff.
Final Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants.
Source: Leagle
