HORTON v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 4:11CV00917JLH. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120222919
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. This action was commenced on December 30, 2011, when the plaintiffs filed their complaint. Although they submitted a check, for the filing fee, that check was returned to the Court as unpaid due to insufficient funds. On January 12, 2012, an employee of the Court sent Mr. Martin a letter informing him that the check had been returned and directing him to submit a Cashier's Check or money order. A copy of that letter is attached hereto, Mr. Martin has not
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. This action was commenced on December 30, 2011, when the plaintiffs filed their complaint. Although they submitted a check, for the filing fee, that check was returned to the Court as unpaid due to insufficient funds. On January 12, 2012, an employee of the Court sent Mr. Martin a letter informing him that the check had been returned and directing him to submit a Cashier's Check or money order. A copy of that letter is attached hereto, Mr. Martin has not r..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
This action was commenced on December 30, 2011, when the plaintiffs filed their complaint. Although they submitted a check, for the filing fee, that check was returned to the Court as unpaid due to insufficient funds. On January 12, 2012, an employee of the Court sent Mr. Martin a letter informing him that the check had been returned and directing him to submit a Cashier's Check or money order. A copy of that letter is attached hereto, Mr. Martin has not responded, and the filing fee has never been paid.
Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) provides, in pertinent part, "If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice." Because the statutorily required filing fee has not been paid and because no response was made to the direction from the Court that the filing fee must be paid, this action is dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
