In re E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company C-8 Personal Injury Litigation, 2:13-md-2433. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20200127613
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2020
Summary: EVIDENTIARY MOTIONS ORDER NO. 35 Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions Related to Corporate Conduct EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court Defendant's Preservation Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Corporate Conduct Experts (ECF No. 5239), Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion (ECF No. 5243), and Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion (ECF No. 5244). For the same reasons the Court set forth in Evidentiary Motions Order No. ("
Summary: EVIDENTIARY MOTIONS ORDER NO. 35 Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions Related to Corporate Conduct EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court Defendant's Preservation Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Corporate Conduct Experts (ECF No. 5239), Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion (ECF No. 5243), and Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion (ECF No. 5244). For the same reasons the Court set forth in Evidentiary Motions Order No. ("E..
More
EVIDENTIARY MOTIONS ORDER NO. 35
Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions Related to Corporate Conduct
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., District Judge.
This matter is before the Court Defendant's Preservation Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs' Corporate Conduct Experts (ECF No. 5239), Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion (ECF No. 5243), and Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion (ECF No. 5244). For the same reasons the Court set forth in Evidentiary Motions Order No. ("EMO") 2 (ECF No. 4129), EMO 8 (ECF No. 4617), and Dispositive Motions Order No. 12 (ECF No. 4841), the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant's Motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
